| 82 | 1 | 23 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为了解专业、性别、逻辑思考能力、学习策略、程序语言与财经类学生程序设计能力的相关性,以问卷调查资料和学生考试成绩作为数据基础,并以统计方法来分析相关性。结果表明,专业和性别在程序设计能力上并无显著相关;逻辑思考能力和程序设计语言在学习效果上显著不同。最后对教师授课、学生学习和教学管理提出相关建议。
Abstract：[1]Colley M,Hill F,Hill J.Gender effects in the stereotyping of those with different kinds of computing experience(computer programming,word processing or computer games)[J].Journal of Educational Computing Research,1995(2):19-27.
[2]Ayersman J,Reed W.Effect of learning styles,programming,and gender on computer anxiety[J].Journal of Research on Computing in Education,1996(2):148-161.
[3]Tobin G,Capie W.The development and validation of a group test of logical thinking[J].Education and Psychological Measurement,1981,41(2):413-423.
[4]Roadrangla V,Padilla R.The construction and validation of group of assessment of logical think(galt)[J].1983(12):148-154.
[5]Schemeck R.Learning styles of college students[M].New York:Springer US,1989.
[6]Snowman.Learning tactics and strategies[J].Cognitive Classroom learning-Understanding,Thinking and Problem Solving,1986:67-71.
[7]Entwistle N.Entwistle D.The relationships between personality study methods and academic performance[J].British Journal of Educational Psychology,1970,40(2):132-143.
[8]曹文平.基于专题的程序设计教学[J].计算机时代,2014(11):72-73.
[9]赵海冰,李瑛,邢翠芳,等.计算机程序设计课程教学中的微课程案例设计[J].计算机工程与科学,2016,38(增刊):55-57.
基本信息:
DOI：10.16512/j.cnki.jsjjy.2020.04.019
中图分类号:TP311.1-4;G642
引用信息:
[1]谢志龙,李庆,邢容,等.面向财经专业的程序设计课程教学研究[J].计算机教育,2020,No.304(04):75-79.DOI:10.16512/j.cnki.jsjjy.2020.04.019.
基金信息:
金融智能与金融工程四川省重点实验室资助
2020-04-10
2020-04-10
